Mildly off topic, but The Telegraph table lists eight suspensions but labels it six? Don’t they have sub editors?
]]>Don’t know about the rest of you but I ALWAYS lead with my knees when I run. I find leading with the heels, arse-cheeks or ears tends to be a less productive running style.
To quote “Bacon” from Lock, Stock and Two Smoking Barrels – left foot, right foot, your body will follow.
A five week ban for running in a straight line while carrying a rugby ball, compared with one week for deliberately charging into a ruck with no attempt to bind and shoulder-charging at the temple of a player in a vulnerable position, committed by a bloke with very recent “previous” for violent conduct (although admittedly I felt the previous one was a load of nonsense too)……….. yeah I would say there’s an imbalance in the way these cases are judged.
]]>For the ones I have seen – there’s no doubt on this particular incident that Tuilagi leads with the knee. Is it an offence? Yes. Is it a 5 week ban? Absolutely not, couple of weeks at most
If this is 5 weeks, should Hooper have got longer.
PS – putting Burgess in this list is typical of Paul Hayward who seems to have something against him. Yes, Burgess tackled Hooper high, mainly ‘cos Hooper was ducking to try and grab the ball after he’d dropped it. It was in no way as bad as the other offences I’ve seen in this list and you could have observed about 10 similar tackles in last night’s Uruguay Fiji game that went unpunished
]]>