How to get that compromise is the nub of the argument. How do you assess the relative merits of each league and then how do you continually assess the strengths as countries leagues will go up and down over a period of time. When the HC was started, it seems as though the Celtic nations had the upper hand and the strength in negotiations, now it would appear to be with the Anglo/French axis. In 5 years time it might have reverted back, and in 15 years time the Latin countries might be bigger players – who knows!
The problem is exasperated by the fact that the clubs only really care about relatively short term financial gain, and the spreading of the game is more the responsibility of the IRB and it’s member unions. However the unions then have a responsibility to the clubs as the clubs produce the players for the national teams, and matters are reversed as additional funding for the clubs comes from the unions. And the clubs can’t operate without the sanction ultimately of the IRB.
Therefore no black and white answer to this solution, only a compromise which will work for a while before becoming outdated.
Given the personalities involved, I think that I’ve just depressed myself – rugby doesn’t generally breed people to accept compromise on the pitch and this attitude is often then taken on into the administration of the game.
]]>Cockerill himself said recently – why all the fuss if Leinster don’t make it into the RCC when teams like Bath also might not? Also we all know the focus on the Italian teams as part of the argument for needing to shake things up.
I don’t think there is a simple answer for two conflicting targets – a European cup of meritocracy. You can only go so far with each one. The PRL bleat on about the lack of meritocracy in the Rabo representation but there is no perfect solution for this. Once you decide “X from each league” or “X from each country” then you immediately have issues where team 7 (to use the top 6 from each league plan) in France could quite possibly be better than team 6 from the Rabo. This is why I detest this part of their argument as their proposal merely moves where the cutoff is; it doesn’t “fix” the problem they are complaining about so it’s just, in my opinion, a smokescreen to redistribute the wealth.
I come down more strongly on the side of “Euro” than “merit”. I am really going to miss the Italian clubs being in the top comp (probably, we all know they probably won’t get in) as it removes a country from the top comp. We’ll probably remove two countries (Scotland or Wales have a chance of not getting into Top 6 in Rabo) and the comp will be “more intense”, more “meritocratic” but, in my opinion, duller.
]]>I do agree with you; different clubs will always put focus on different areas and there shouldn’t be an issue with that.
The one thing I would say if the views on the Amlin. Then I say I’d rather Wasps focus on the Amlin, it wasn’t because I want to use it as a way to qualify for the Heineken (if the tournament exists), but because I’ve missed watching Wasps have a good European Cup run the last few years!
Your comment (and many from Celtic league fans), highlights the difference in the respect for the Amlin. To you, it is “a better vehicle for top flight Euro rugby next season than getting into the top 6.” (sorry to quote you but the wording made sense). To me, it’s a European competition in its own right that I’d like my club to do well in!
]]>It is, after all, the way it works in all highly developed Rugby countries (excepting England and France).
If you think about it, why should a Spanish club play in this comp, when the likes of Hawick, Cork Constutution or Neath do not?
This is not a criticism of franchises by the way – it just seems to me that the lower level european game (of which I am a great supporter) is missing a trick here.
]]>All I am suggesting is, Wasps are more likely (I am hoping) to put more focus on the Amlin than the French sides. That makes me a little more confident that we will get through this group. We also beat Bayonne quite comfortably in recent seasons.
Did I mention the Celtic league once in my original comment? Not sure why you’ve jumped on that…
]]>