Yr last sentence is something I’ve apparently ‘regurgitated’ since Adam, but I can’t resist it. Spot on! And I didn’t mention the ‘C’ word.
]]>Anyhoo,back to the rugby. I said that Hartley and Wood were shoe ins for this game.
Whenever Lancaster trots out the “he’s been showing a lot of promise and deserves his chance” line, the subtext is always “I don’t really trust you/think you are good enough,but I picked you so I’ll give you one run out just to look more flexible than I really am”.
Haskelll and Webber need games,particularly webber in order to ensure they are genuine deputies(if not actual starters) come the 6N.
Re the team? Pretty much what was expected. Lancaster has to settle on a midfield pairing though.
Tempus fugit Stuart!
]]>that is not intended to be a slight on Barritt, but I do think that his defence is very important to the team, and that if he is not the next Guscott/Horan/Sella (showing my age?) then thats OK if he has passers inside him and runners outside.
ps I would prefer Eastmond at 12, and love Burrells lines, but do worry about his defensive positions.
]]>