Its balls.
England have fundamental problems with their strategy, style of play and therefore inevitably given the first two, their selection. One particular aspect of this is that their play at the breakdown has been, with one or two notable exceptions, awful – and that is the responsibility of the entire pack. Changing one man will make very little difference to this and will have made absolutely no difference to these World Cup results.
Get the foundations in place, decide upon strategy and a style of play and then choose the personnel that fits those decisions – and then, and this is key, stick with them and don’t suddenly change the entire style of the team in a panic
Finding a replacement for Robshaw at 7 is important (and by the way, it would be idiocy to jettison Robshaw completely) but its not even close to being the most important issue facing the England team
]]>For me, the key is more the front 5. Jenks can alienate a referee if he struggles at the scrum, and although AWJ and Charteris are fantastic players, they, for me, are off the pace off Jager and Etzebeth – as a pair they are on fire at the moment.
But with no disrespect to the teams in Pool B, have SA really been tested yet, even with the Japan result? If Wales get any form of platform in the set piece, keep ball in hand, and play with the ferocity of the last 2 weeks, who knows.
]]>They could have had Pocock or McCaw playing at 7 and neither would have made any difference to the results.
There is no one man messiah out there. The failings are mutual not individual
]]>