I don’t want to indulge in hyperbole but SHOULD England come unstuck this weekend,where does that leave Lancaster?
]]>Yes he played well in the 6N (but was appalling in the Autumn) and I’m completely convinced the improvement in the 6N was largely down to being outside a 9 on top form who was calling a lot of the plays and taking a lot of the decision making responsibility. Care is now out of form and Farrell is back to where he was before.
Clearly he’s not without his attributes, but at 10 (or 12) we really need someone who can challenge the gainline and it’s not Farrell.
]]>…. and whilst his distribution may be a bit better than he gets credit for, the reason for picking him is never going to be his passing.
]]>I would add though, that if all were judged on their last outing, Ford wouldn’t have to do much to surpass Carter.
]]>However, I do think that his distribution is decent, and vastly under-rated.
Whilst it was quite one dimensional (not his fault), I also think that he “boshed” quite effectively on saturday against SA.
]]>I do recall however that after he lost his England place, got injured, then returned, he was quite ordinary for Bath. However that sort of form does seem to be behind him again, so I do believe he is genuinely one to consider at 13.
He did, incidentally, play in the same U20’s team as Ford, Farrell and Daly, occasionally on the wing.
]]>Given current for he would be my choice for 13. He can work on developing his distribution and defence, but I think he has the potential to develop into a player like Conrad Smith. Not the most physical, but just glides through gaps and solid in the tackle.
Slade is also this type of player.
If you looked in future to play tuilagi at 12 they would be perfect with him.
]]>