I’d prefer to see Foden at 15 and Ford given a run at 10 with Farrell inside him, personally. The point of this article was to make some assumptions based on the recent tour and the EPS, but I completely agree that the Saxons selections could play a crucial role if they are required to step up.
]]>I’m therefore not surprised that there are some areas that are not changed for a specific reason.
I also think that there is precedent for people stepping straight up into the EPS and going almost straight into the side (cast your minds back to January, Parling was left out in favour of Deacon and became 1st choice second row relatively quickly after Lawes injury).
So in that respect, I don’t think you can say that Foden’s future is deemed to be at 11. It may well be that he is used there, and why not, but it may be a more valid point to group him in your adaptability group.
Wade, Strettle and May are all in the second tier waiting to be moved up if/when injuries take their toll. Likewise, in respect of Point 2, Ford is sitting there waiting. Is he ready for Test rugby? Possibly not quite yet, for which reason his appearance at Saxons level is a valid progressive step. Ruling him out for the foreseeable future is a little sensational in my opinion.
]]>The openside issue concerned me throughout the last world cup, but seeing Robshaw in action recently, I’m convinced that two ‘6.5s’ (Robshaw and Wood) might actually give us better balance anyway.
]]>