Joubert had a split second to decide & ANY ref would have likely made the same decision under the same circs. What else could have been the case? Hindsight & replays are as useless as an ashtray on a motorbike… AFTER the event.
If the TMO ‘controlled’ the game, the right decisions would surely more often be made as he could ‘correct’ the ref…& thus avoid the controversy events like that of last w/end.
The argument that TMO ‘interference’ would waste time just doesn’t stack up when compared with ave scrum time wastage; i.e. 10 / game! The real ? is; ‘do we want the correct result or not’?
A no brainer for me. It’s got to be right decisions… & refs need more support from WR to this end, esp in the aftermath of controversy.
‘player safety (does )come(s) first’, so ‘the citing process has to reviewed’! And ‘referees (DO) need that extra help in a high pressure situations’.
Well argued Ally.
]]>However, when Barnes missed that fwd pass in 2007, any EnZeder stating this was labelled a whinger or a whiner or ‘.. it’s what happens on the day’ etc. Sound familiar? Well what’s the diff? Perhaps because of collective anger that the NH are out of the 1/4ers? Can’t have it both ways folks.
For me joubert has been a ref who lets the game flow so that we actually see some rugby. That he’s been pilloried by WC smacks of his being hung out 2 dry.
Poor form.
]]>Suck it up princess.
]]>There are some areas to address for world rugby:
1 The citing process has to reviewed.It has been inconsistent at best,not applied in an equitable way to all countries and some incidents e.g tip-tackles being cited for some games & missed in others.
I do believe player safety comes first and high tackles etc need to be penalised.
2 The referees need that extra help in a high pressure situation to have the right to check any decision at their discretion,especially match deciding ones.I realise we don’t want to have numerous stoppages in a match,but I’d rather the game was a little longer & get the right decision,especially if it decides the match.
Hopefully some good will come out of these incidents to improve citing and use of the TMO,removing dangerous tackles and helping the referees get the decision right,especially ones that decide the match.
Joubert was wrong but even so, World Rugby should be backing a decision that was made in a split second and pointing out that he could not use the TMO
Any other words can be had in private not in the media. This just makes it much, much worse.
]]>Yes, he’s incompetent and needed to be trained and/or sidelined, but in a decent manner, not in public. World Rugby have just made a fiasco out of a farce.
]]>