Release them for games to the smaller unions so they can get game time and we can get a lot more clubs performing in our country. This way the selectors can see more people with talent have game time.
I personally would love to see the Gryphons, and the Falcons and so on increase their standard of play to where we can start getting a few thousand people to their stadiums, and then we can also see a lot more superstars get spoken about instead of the usual 5 we have from teh usual unions.
Share talent, don’t hoard and smother it.
]]>I know people will look at the Ellis Park test match and like you have done above, suggest it means they can play that type of game. I disagree. They Lost. By 11 points. At home.
They will not beat NZ at their own game. NZ have the best skill set in the world from 1 to 15.
So either, Meyer is forced into playing the limited game plan that SA can achieve great success from. Or, as Mallett says, they begin developing their skills to play a more expansive game plan.
]]>The brand seems to be going a bit stale.
]]>If South Africa ever came across a team that could match them physically and technically in the forwards, then I think they would find it very hard to come up with (or at at least execute) another style of play. If you look at the Springboks purely in terms of attack they probably rank about 5th-6th in the world, maybe lower when you think of teams that can really throw the ball around (Fiji, Samoa, New Zealand France on their day etc)
]]>