
This time a year ago, Christian Wade was all set to start his first home England international, expected to be named on the wing for the game against Australia. Then, at the worst possible time, injury hit.
He missed the entire series and, as it happened, most of the rest of the season, only returning to full fitness right at the very end, when it was too late to be considered for England’s tour of New Zealand.
It has been the general consensus since then, or even since before that, when he burst so spectacularly into our rugby consciousness with his dazzlingly quick feet and impossible changes of direction, that one day Wade would be an England regular.
Back fit and firing this season, then, it is a surprise that he has been omitted from Lancaster’s initial 33-man squad for the upcoming November Internationals. It is even more surprising given the outrageously good solo try he scored at the weekend against Leinster.
When looking at wingers, Lancaster and his coaching team talk of looking for a ‘point of difference’ – i.e. something that makes you stand out from the rest. Jonny May’s blistering pace, for example, Semesa Rokoduguni’s raw power, or Jack Nowell’s ability to beat the first man.
Wade, of course, arguably has a greater ‘point of difference’ than any of England’s other wingers – his sidestep and acceleration are simply unparalleled, and allow him to do things defenders cannot handle.
The caveat to having this point of difference, however, is that the winger must be good across the board at everything else. He must have a kicking game, he must be positionally sound, he must be able to defend robustly – and the list goes on.
It is perhaps in this regard that we find Wade’s downfall. He has produced moments of pure magic already this season, but sadly he has also produced moments of pure madness. He has essentially individually conceded two tries through failing to be able to ground the ball behind his own line.
These are things that he can put right in the near future, and no doubt Lancaster and co will be keeping a close eye on him in the coming weeks. Indeed, Wade could be one of the additional seven players to join the squad this weekend, but with four wingers already named and other areas of the squad looking thinner, this feels unlikely.
It is proof that, at the end of the day, Lancaster is not afraid of making the big decisions even if it means he’ll come in for some flak from the fans, many of whom are dying to see Wade back in the white of England.
There is also no room for Matt Kvesic, who, it has always been felt, was being groomed as Robshaw’s understudy and potential successor. He has been included in previous squad when not playing that well at club level, but this time the form of players like James Haskell and Calum Clark has forced Lancaster’s hand. Another fairly ruthless cull.
Stephen Myler is another player that is obviously highly rated by the coaching group, and is included at the expense of a certain Danny Cipriani and, to a lesser extent, Freddie Burns. The redemption stories of those two – particularly Cipriani – would have made a nice story, but again Lancaster has proved his indifference towards sentiment.
The only exception to this rule seems to be Billy Twelvetrees. The England coaches have invested a lot of time and effort into the Gloucester centre, who is included in the squad again despite the general feeling that he has never really made the 12 shirt his own after countless opportunities to do so. They still believe that he has a role to play in the England squad, and at some point he really has to start repaying that faith.
Fans rarely agree with every single selection decision international coaches make, and just as England supporters bemoan Wade’s absence so Wales fans have their gripes with Gatland’s squad for the autumn.
In the positive column, gone is Adam Jones who has been having a torrid time of things of late. For such a warrior, not to mention a nice man, to be omitted makes it a very bittersweet positive, of course.
Sadly there seems to be more in the negative column, from the fans’ point of view. The exclusion of Rhys Patchell is baffling given his obvious natural talent, while Eli Walker seems to be in a similar situation to Wade – immensely gifted, back on form after injury but still seemingly not having done enough by the coaches’ standards to warrant inclusion. There is also the general fear that Gatland will ignore form this autumn and continue to pick those players considered his favourites.
Should the likes of Phillips, Priestland and Cuthbert be selected consistently this autumn, when there are alternatives in far better form, and Wales lose, the fallout will not be pretty.
Crisis? What crisis? From the manner in which the Wallabies so nearly overcame the All Blacks last weekend, you would be forgiven for thinking the Di Patston/Kurtley Beale saga was merely a bad nightmare Ewen McKenzie was yet to wake up from. Yes, they lost, but the manner in which they played was supremely positive and will not have escaped the attentions of England and Wales.
If the off-field problems can be overcome, new head honcho Michael Cheika seems to have inherited less of a poisoned chalice than at first it seemed.
By Jamie Hosie
Follow Jamie on Twitter: @jhosie43
Photo by: Patrick Khachfe / Onside Images
17 replies on “No room for sentiment in Lancaster’s new England”
Looks like Wade might be the new Simpson-Daniel. Matt Kvesic in great form at the moment, so surprised he was overlooked, and same with Ben Foden. We’ll see how they play next month and then decide if SL has done the right thing!
Spot on, with regards to Wade, and he WILL be worked into the squad before the WC. I don’t see how they can afford to be without him, even with the other excellent options at their disposal.
The omission I’m most surprised by, however, is that of Graham Kitchener. He’s the total package and is in blistering form for Leicester, right now; I can’t understand how Kruis, who is a good player, got the nod ahead of him. I suspect that, like Wade, Kitchener will get his chance soon, whether he’s a late call up to the extended squad or drafted in as injury cover. Either way, barring injury to himself, I can’t see Lancaster being able to ignore him for too much longer.
Another absent player I’d have liked to see given a shot is Dave Ewers. A destructive juggernaut of a ball carrier, he’s probably the form 6 in the premiership and, at times, seems almost unstoppable, one on one. I’d have loved to see him in an England shirt again, but I can certainly understand his exclusion given the depth of talent mixed with experience Lancaster has in his ranks.
Eddie, the problem for Ewers is that he is behind Morgan and Vunipola in the ball carrying stakes.
Put Ewers in an England shirt, and I guarantee he’ll be giving Morgan and Vunipolla a serious run for their money. As incredible as they are at carrying the ball, Ewers has the potential to be even better! Bold words, I know, but he’s that good. I’m not actually suggesting that he deserves to leap-frog them in the pecking order, mind you, but I would like to see him involved in some capacity. As I said, in my previous post, I do, however, completely understand his exclusion.
All of that being said, he’s playing at 6, so I suspect he’s really competing with the other flankers in the squad who can all play 6,7, and 8, so, most likely, it’s their versatility that is his greatest obstacle.
The selection was not surprising,
However it makes me slightly depressed. England will always go with safety first, they pick reliable players and always have, this is not an SL thing.
Wade has his defensive problems, no doubt. But look at the other players who have been left out: Cipp, Foden, Burns. I am not saying for a minute that these guys should all be in the team but some should. I am glad to see Ford and Eastmond get the chance that their form deserve, but I worry for Ford. He is a great player, really great. Bath know this and chose to protect him with lots of dummy runners fixing the defensive blitz allowing Ford to run the loop and make the play. England will make no such concessions, the attitude will be that everybody is the same. Ford could get creamed and then bashed by the media for not being international class.
The basic thing is that we always focus on what guys cannot do rather than what they can. The idea that no man can be carried, that it is a team game. It is a team game but that means a blend of different qualities not 15 guys with roughly the same qualities. The All Black d not expect Dan Carter to tackle like a blind side flanker, but one of farrell’s strengths is that he is a good tackler. I guarantee nobody was talking about Carter’s tackling ability when he started, or his lack of it. His tackling was irrelevant.
I like this England team but I fear that they are lacking the cutting edge, the game changer to win any big event. Without Manu the backline looks bland to say the least. Stop England upfront, not easy, and you win the game. we will struggle to dominate every game up front from now until the WC.
There is no plan B. When plan A doesn’t work you just keep going and hope the other team lose concentration.
I see some of your points, but I think you’re underestimating some of the players. Burrell is probably just as good ad Tuilagi, but in different ways. His kicking, offloading and tackling is better. The problem is we haven’t seen the best of him, because he hasn’t had a centre partner who compliments his abilities like Pisi does for Northampton. I think if we could play Eastmond and Burrell together, we could start to see the best of Burrell.
As far as cutting edge goes, again I think someone like Roko coming in is great. Nowell is good, but Roko is better again. He’s been picked because he’s great going forward, has great feet and pace, but is solid in defence. Wade can be magical in tight spaces, and we know his pace is excellent but his defence at times is shocking. His positional play on the back foot is worrying.
I have read quotes from Lancaster this morning about how their number one selection criteria is now consistency, and in particular ‘consistent execution of skill’. So it seems (of course) that players are judged over a long period of time on all aspects of their game and not just the flash bits that go into highlight reels.
This may well lead to what some consider boring looking squads but I agree with Lancaster. When you have 22 guys out their working their asses off to execute the game plan that has been worked on in training all week, you need people to be executing and not making silly mistakes. So although players like Wade can offer such awesome moments like we saw against Leinster, it means nothing if he’s making defensive mistakes such as not grounding the ball behind his own line! I actually hope that Wade is bought into camp and coached, because if he can sort those things out, he will be in the squad. But at the moment, he is not among the best all-round 4 wingers.
This is his reasoning for picking Myler over Cipriani, with such mundane things as executing clearing kicks being all important (I have not seen much of Cipriani play however, so I don’t know how good this side of his game is). With that said, I’m not sure how Twelvetrees is still in the squad because he is the definition of hot and cold for me, although I was always a fan of him when he first came into the team.
I have also read the players to come in at the weekend will be Watson, Slade, Wigglesworth, Kvesic, Paice and another prop and lock. I’m not sure why Wigglesworth is needed, 3 scrum halves is enough and they will definitely need a loose head and tight head prop.
I was a little surprised Wiggy wasn’t in there before. Dickson has been on the bench for Saints most of this season so far, and Youngs has not been in great form for Leicester. Whereas Wiggy has been in form and started all but one game for Sarries if my memory serves me correctly.
Yeah I can understand an argument for having Wigglesworth as one of three scrum halves in the first place, but really my point was about not needing a fourth scrum half when there are only two players for each of the front row positions already, when that is a far more attritional position. But as Jamie says below, Wigglesworth’s call up will just be training cover for Care really.
IMO, the form scrumhalf in England is Gloucester’s Dan Robson, but he’s not even in contention. Of course, his cause isn’t helped by the fact that he’s sharing the shirt with Laidlaw, but it IS just a matter of time.
Eddie, Robson is good and I said on here 12 months ago that he was an England cert in the future, but Laidlaw has been starting and getting most game time, so even as a Robson fan, I wouldn’t say he was the form scrum half in England. He is definitely the future though.
Matt, re Wigglesworth, I was there yesterday and Lancaster said the reason he might be brought in is that Danny Care will be playing at 5pm on Sunday, and England have training sessions on Monday and Tuesday next week – so Care wouldn’t be able to train Monday, and possibly not Tuesday either. So I imagine the 7 coming into camp will be a mixture of younger guys Lancaster wants to see in the England environment (Watson, Slade) and those providing cover for the Quins/Wasps players in action on Sunday evening (Kvesic, Wigglesworth).
My great concern is our lack of preparation time whereas the AB’s have been in camp since August and 8 or so recent matches under their belt.Until now player’s minds have been on their club.I fear we will be very rusty and that NZ might be out of sight by 1/2 time.That means 4 losses on the bounce to them a year before the rwc.It worries me
Ronnie, (assuming that you’re English), If I’d stated this, I’d be castigated for being, in effect, anti English, but I mostly agree with you. See my views, somewhat ltd due to available time, if interested, @ england-squad-for-november-internationals-announced#comment-371878. However, I also think that it’s not just the squad that’s SL’s picked, but it’s as much to do with his coaching style, which, by it’s relative consevatism, dictates whom he selects. He seems to look @ the 1/2 empty glass when considering e.g. Wade. Why not look @ the guy’s pro’s & see if they outweigh his cons? Then he could potentially build some game, with support, around Wade to max his unique skills.However he’s picks new boy, ‘raw power’ Rokoduguni because he’s consistant? Basically he’s a big’un. Beats a little’un almost every time? But is Roko gonna run over e.g. his AB oppo in Nov? That’s the real ? And it’s only v the top oppo that, in the end, counts. Wade might well scoot l or r (who knows? His oppo?) around an oppo tho. Same with Farrell v Cip. Has SL forgotten DC’s dismanting of Ireland? Indeed, how depressing. Ah, well.
Jamie
Why not GI Joe Simpson of Wasps then? Always looked a pretty robust, agressive, unpredictable & capable 1/2 to me.
Simon Scantlebury
I hope so!
Matt B
Well you & Lancaster have something in common then?