Comments on: Rugby World Cup 2015: England player ratings vs Uruguay http://www.therugbyblog.com/rugby-world-cup-2015-england-player-ratings-vs-uruguay Rugby Union opinion and discussion, for the fans, by the fans. Sat, 31 Dec 2016 12:12:31 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=4.6 By: Don Phttp://www.therugbyblog.com/rugby-world-cup-2015-england-player-ratings-vs-uruguay#comment-382094 Tue, 13 Oct 2015 14:40:00 +0000 http://www.therugbyblog.com/?p=39799#comment-382094 The scoring must be taken with a grain of salt here as the oppo could hardly knock the skin off a rice pudding.

Most look good when their side dominates possession, territory, but it’s v better teams that these points ratings need to be made.

As mentioned above though, when Nowell scored a particular try of note, England’s midfield handling was sharp… & as they could only play what was in front of them, some of these moves still rated highly.

]]>
By: Don Phttp://www.therugbyblog.com/rugby-world-cup-2015-england-player-ratings-vs-uruguay#comment-382091 Tue, 13 Oct 2015 14:29:54 +0000 http://www.therugbyblog.com/?p=39799#comment-382091 Good thinking Dazza.

I’ve also been critical of Ford before as, when the hair dryer’s, on he can make duff choices (kicking needlessly to the oppo when retention of possession was the right choice; e.g. v Saracens late on & also v Fr over there) & his execution deserts him (again v Fr when he dropped a catch, missed a pen touch, dropped out on the full plus kicked down Spedding’s throat, all in the 1st 7!)

However, I’d have him in over Farrell any day as at least he has the potential of being able to run, pass or kick. Farrell will kick goals & tackles (except for missing his man, Foley, twice, allowing Oz to score tries), but offers little else – at top level.

Personally I’d have gone for Cipriani over the 2 of them, but that’s another story.

Seems Ford needs counselling to keep his thinking going under pressure because, unless he can master this, England need to move on to another.

Agree regds midfield as well. Lancs chipped & chopped & changed till it made my head (& his?) spin. Dunno why he didn’t go with the Bath line & supplement it with say JJ, Slade(?), Nowell etc.

Late on, when Nowell scored down the right at 1 time in particular, England’s back line handling looked (& was) slick, but I ? why they weren’t playing like this from the beginning, i.e., v Wales & Oz. Can surely only be from the coaches’ lack of belief & faith in an all court game & fear of failure? Why else on earth would Burgess have EVER got into these sides… & then, even more rapidly, be gone!?

So, your last para makes perfect sense to me… & hopefully to Ritchie, Andrew etc… & as much to the point, the ‘new'(?) coach/es.

]]>
By: Don Phttp://www.therugbyblog.com/rugby-world-cup-2015-england-player-ratings-vs-uruguay#comment-382090 Tue, 13 Oct 2015 13:59:16 +0000 http://www.therugbyblog.com/?p=39799#comment-382090 Look England are the richest nation in on earth, in terms of money, facilities, resources & player no’s, but surely this & your opinion miss the point.

You’re falling into the age old trap, which Lancaster himself was also quick to promote, that within the next 4 years England will be ‘a world class squad’.

You’ve ALWAYS had players aplenty, but it’s in your coaching where you fall over. Without a w class coaching set up you’ll likely fail again. No matter that you may have Superman, Bruce Willis & even King Kong in your squad!

It’s 1st of all about a change in your thinking at the top, i.e. Ritchie, Andrew etc, whereby they keep picking wrongun’s. Somebody’s already mentioned ‘The Godfather’ clause that ‘The fish rots from the head down’.

It’s a mind set change in thinking that’s required. It’s about what you want to achieve & then how you go about doing it.

Otherwise it’s just more of the same with a new face which is unlikely to work.

]]>
By: Dazzahttp://www.therugbyblog.com/rugby-world-cup-2015-england-player-ratings-vs-uruguay#comment-382089 Tue, 13 Oct 2015 13:58:46 +0000 http://www.therugbyblog.com/?p=39799#comment-382089 I think an even score for both would be fair. Both of them made mistakes that neither should make at this level, especially against a team like Uruguay.

I would like to see Burrell with Slade in the midfield, as I think they would compliment each other better than Burrell and JJ. Also think Slade and Daly would be a good partnership. Slade looked quite comfortable at 12, and Daly needs to be in the set up.

]]>
By: Benjithttp://www.therugbyblog.com/rugby-world-cup-2015-england-player-ratings-vs-uruguay#comment-382086 Tue, 13 Oct 2015 13:00:04 +0000 http://www.therugbyblog.com/?p=39799#comment-382086 I take your points Dazza, didn’t think Ford had a great game, but put it down the points above. Again I know as a pro he needs to take this on the chin (and I’m sure he will) but the mecurial players have always needed better man managing that this coaching team seems capable of doing.

Ford was trusted with 2 starts, neither tier one nations (not that we are these days), and both times required a defensive baby sitter in Barritt and Farrell. I think even the most self confident of players would be affected.

Farrell was chosen to tackle and kick, both with mixed success. Maybe just have them both at 5.5 and be done with it!

]]>
By: Dazzahttp://www.therugbyblog.com/rugby-world-cup-2015-england-player-ratings-vs-uruguay#comment-382085 Tue, 13 Oct 2015 12:37:18 +0000 http://www.therugbyblog.com/?p=39799#comment-382085 My specs were well and truly off Benjit. Thrown off in disgust ;-)!

I just couldn’t understand Farrell being marked down for missing two tackles and two conversions, when the two tackles Farrell missed were tackles already missed by Ford, and Ford missed all his conversions.
Also don’t remember Ford making any memorable breaks through the midfield or really threatening the gain etc, etc.
I don’t remember Farrell putting in a cross field kick in his own 22, with two men outside him and two defenders in front of him (said kick then going straight into touch!). Or bending down to attempt to pick up the ball from a wobbly line out throw (from a Sarries player no less!!), only to knock it on. Either jump on it, or kick it up field, but don’t try and pick it up with the Urugayan pack piling through from the lineout.

I take your point about Ford, but at this level players have to take it on the chin and move on. This should have been the ideal game for Ford to do that, concentrate on running the back line and getting some flow to the attack. Maybe he would have been better without Farrell? I don’t know, but if he can’t take the knocks and kickbacks that come at this level, then he’s not going to make it at this level.

Whoever takes this England team forward from here needs to think long and hard about what sort of midfield they want to play with, and play the players who fit that. Both Ford and Farrell should have a part in that, as they are the best we have at the moment.

]]>
By: Benjithttp://www.therugbyblog.com/rugby-world-cup-2015-england-player-ratings-vs-uruguay#comment-382082 Tue, 13 Oct 2015 11:42:01 +0000 http://www.therugbyblog.com/?p=39799#comment-382082 Dazza, take off your Sarries tinted specs, and see my comments above re Ford. He has been hung out to dry and looked a lot better with a balanced midfield of Slade and Joseph.

]]>
By: Benjithttp://www.therugbyblog.com/rugby-world-cup-2015-england-player-ratings-vs-uruguay#comment-382081 Tue, 13 Oct 2015 11:38:33 +0000 http://www.therugbyblog.com/?p=39799#comment-382081 Or Farrell, Burgess and Slade – at least it was tried and tested. I do though have some sympathy for young George. He was basically hung out to dry by Lancaster, despite playing pretty well over the last 12 months (including his goal kicking – which he was responsible for when Faz was at 12 vs Samoa).

Managment basically said to him that we don’t trust you. Is it any wonder his confidence was shot and he made errors?

]]>
By: Dazzahttp://www.therugbyblog.com/rugby-world-cup-2015-england-player-ratings-vs-uruguay#comment-382075 Tue, 13 Oct 2015 11:08:02 +0000 http://www.therugbyblog.com/?p=39799#comment-382075 Totally agree. I think if we’d started with Farrell, Slade and JJ, the score would have been a fair bit higher. Ford wasted chances, and made some poor decisions in attack, and also missed all his conversions, which is what Farrell’s been marked down for.

]]>
By: Dazzahttp://www.therugbyblog.com/rugby-world-cup-2015-england-player-ratings-vs-uruguay#comment-382073 Tue, 13 Oct 2015 10:58:54 +0000 http://www.therugbyblog.com/?p=39799#comment-382073 Farrell 5.5, Ford 6?! Really!!?? So Farrell misses two conversions and a couple of tackles, but does make one good break early in the first half and links up well with Slade and the back three and gets marked 5.5?

Ford puts crossfield kicks into touch, misses all his conversions, fails to jump on a loose ball, instead knocking it on on the floor to give away possession, hardly makes a decent break all game, and shows some serious hesitation and gets marked a 6?

This should have been a game for Ford to flourish and how his attacking flair, but he didn’t even get his kicking boots on. Think you must have been watching a different game to me.

To be honest I think you’ve been quite generous in all these scores apart from Easter, Nowell, Slade and Launchbury.

]]>
By: snewehttp://www.therugbyblog.com/rugby-world-cup-2015-england-player-ratings-vs-uruguay#comment-382072 Tue, 13 Oct 2015 10:07:12 +0000 http://www.therugbyblog.com/?p=39799#comment-382072 As a Leicester fan, what do you make of catchpole at 12. I haven’t seen too much but he does look good.
The beltrain is a very good prop and Pearce looks a lively prospect. More a 6 than 8?

]]>
By: Staggyhttp://www.therugbyblog.com/rugby-world-cup-2015-england-player-ratings-vs-uruguay#comment-382070 Tue, 13 Oct 2015 08:31:16 +0000 http://www.therugbyblog.com/?p=39799#comment-382070 I think that it was still the Maori side step outside the nightclub – still going for contact!

]]>