What now for Munster after Heineken Cup heartache?

Sunday’s game in the south of France was a disappointment for all Munster rugby supporters, although Conor Buckley suggests that a result like that has been coming.

Thomond Park

The warning signs of yesterdays exit from the Heineken Cup have been there for quite some time. Reliance on heart and grit to get Munster through the current set of problems was not enough. Munster have qualified for the knockout stages on the Heineken Cup 12 times in succession and yesterday saw the end of that proud record. Next weekend’s final group game against London Irish could be the last European game for a few of their great servants.

Congratulations to Toulon, they outplayed Munster and deserve to qualify for the knockout stages.

But what next for Munster, both short-term and longer-term, how does the team bounce back? It’s time to take stock, time for a few great servants to move on, then time to rebuild. A shake-up of this squad is necessary, a shake-up of the management is also required.

In the first half, Munster played without an apparent game plan. Unable to string phases together by conceding possession or penalties. They made little effort to play for territory, instead opting to spread the ball wide where the well-organised Toulon defense more often than not shepherded the wingers into touch. The backline play was unimaginative, predictable and lacked any penetration.

There was a real lack of discipline in this Munster side. Donnacha O’Callaghan’s needless obstruction earned him a yellow card, only for Ronan O’Gara to see yellow later in the game for an off-the-ball incident with Toulon scrumhalf Mignoni. It wasn’t until the last 10 minutes when 23 points down that they kept the ball alive, and this is what they should have been doing all match. Meanwhile, the Munster scrum had that familiar creaking sound that we have been hearing all season.

The issue of players who appear to be beyond their prime is one that has to be addressed. Is it finally the end of the road for John Hayes, Marcus Horan, Alan Quinlan and David Wallace? The scary answer to this question for two of these players is no. Hayes and Wallace will almost definitely be taken on the plane to New Zealand later in the Autumn and, so, will play up until the Rugby World Cup is over.

But Munster need to go deeper than just replace those that retire. There is immediate need for some international-standard players in key positions. To make this happen Munster should consider the release of Mafi and Tuitupou, which along with the departure of Paul Warwick, frees up three Non-Irish-Qualified player contracts.

So, what’s on Munster’s shopping list for the close season? An inside centre, an International-standard backrow and a Tighthead Prop perhaps?

Looking at previous Munster inside-centres, the likes of Halstead and Tipoki are Munster legends, both similar hardman-straight-running-battering-ram-style players.

Watching the weekend’s game and lack of penetration by the backs, this weakness was never more apparent. A style of player such as Halstead playing alongside Keith Earls would reap much richer rewards than what we have witnessed over the past couple of seasons. One player that fits this mould of inside centre is Kiwi Ma’a Nonu – the rumors of his move to Munster have quietened in the last month or so, but expect them to flare up again very soon!

Regarding the backrow, Munster have some quality coming through from the academy in Peter O’Mahony and Paddy Butler, but they would benefit from a top backrower to balance things out.

As far as the tighthead prop situation goes, Ulster Rugby will need to keep 24hr surveillance on BJ Botha until he has signed a new contract for them. The Munster management also missed a trick by not making inquiries regarding Connacht’s young prop Jamie Hagan who has been outstanding for them this season. He signed a deal last week which will see him staying in the west for another 2 years.

It’s now time to blood the up and coming players like Mike Sherry, Ian Nagle, Peter O’Mahony and Conor Murray, and set Munster up for another 12 years at the top.

By Conor Buckley (reproduced with permission from ninetyninecall.wordpress.com

6 thoughts on “What now for Munster after Heineken Cup heartache?

  1. Was very surprised to see Hagan sign a new deal at Connacht. Thought he’d done more than enough to get a contract at one of the tops sides. Been really impressed with and the boy sure can scrummage.

  2. Munster management definitely missed the boat on not signing Hagan. The other major faux-pas by them has been not attempting to keep Paul Warwick from moving, Warwick has been a key player for Munster in his time at the club. Hi flexibility to cover multiple positions at the back has been invaluable to the team.
    One can only assume that Munster didn’t sign Hagan as they have someone else in mind?

  3. I haven’t heard of Hagan but interested to see him play if he’s getting such great reviews. I have to say that much as John Hayes has been a journeyman and legend for Munster and Ireland, I don’t see how he’s amassed so many caps nor how he’s so highly rated. New blood to take over from his ageing body is sorely needed. Quinlan is getting on a bit too and starting to look a bit stale, so again a fresh set of legs and some added dynamism in the back row would help Munster develop and push forward. Wallace is still class though and I think he’s crucial to keep in a team as a leader and mentor for the younger players coming through. Too much change at once can ruin a team and its confidence, so players such as Wallace are key to making the assimilation as smooth as possible.

    The centres have been Munster’s weak point for a couple of seasons now, ever since the failed Jean deVilliers experiment. Earls is a class player, but he also has a tendency to go missing and to be dominated by the opposition for some key games. He still looks young and lightweight (of which he is both) so you’re right, a large route-one centre to shore up the inside channel is crucial. Nonu would be an awesome signing if the rumours are true, as he has the power but also the offloading game to create space for earls and the outside runners.

    It’s a sad day when Munster aren’t involved in the latter stages of the Heineken as no-one embodies the passion and stepping-up-to-the-plate mentality as they do. However, I don’t see it as an end of an era, but a time for tweaking and introducing a couple of young players in key positions. In a couple of seasons, we’ll be talking about who is going to take over from Ronan O’Gara (a huge question mark), but for the time being the majority of the stars have plenty left to give.

  4. I wouldn’t agree with the opinion that deVilliers was a failed experiment, I will admit it took him some time to bed in, but once he settled he contributed greatly to the team. He got crucial scores in the big games, 8 tries from 23 games, three of those in HCup. The only reason he left was to earn his place back on the Springbok squad before RWC, otherwise he would still be with Munster.
    Quite why Peter deVilliers insisted on playing him out of position on the wing for so long is a complete mystery however.

  5. I wouldnt be panicking too much if i was munster, i doubt any side would have beaten Toulon on sat.

    Munster seem to be lacking a bit of meat in the front 5, otherwise they look good.

Comments are closed.