WRU and RRW Joint Statement: New Rugby Services Agreement

The WRU and Regional Rugby Wales have released a joint statement about their new £60m ‘Rugby Services Agreement’, to ‘provide a new and positive contractual relationship between the WRU and its four Regions for the next six years.’

Dual contracts are to be offered for key Welsh players to prevent the steady exodus of top talent, marking a ‘new era for the professional game in Wales’.

The full statement is here in full:

A £60 million Rugby Services Agreement (RSA) which provides a new and positive contractual relationship between the WRU and its four Regions for the next six years has been agreed.

It marks a new era for the professional game in Wales with National Dual Contracts for key players on offer for the first time.

The WRU and the Regions will utilise the contracts to focus on ensuring a core of leading Welsh international players remain in Wales with the four Regions and a vital facility to help retain key individuals who make it to the top of the player development structure now in place in Wales.

The new RSA is formulated around rugby protocols which define a collaborative approach between Wales and Regional coaching and backroom teams to ensure the best Welsh qualified players are identified, nurtured and retained.

The RSA delivers £8.7m a year to the Regions guaranteed to be spent on Welsh qualified players with a complex matrix of funding also guaranteeing a further £3.6m in loan facilities from the WRU repayable during the term of the RSA. Each Region also receives a one-off £500,000 payment on signature of the new RSA.

Within the £8.7m an annual sum of £2m from the WRU has been allocated to be spent by the governing body directly on the National Dual Contracts with an additional £1.3m from the Regions added to the annual spend or £3.3m in total.

Players to be offered a new National Dual Contract will be chosen by the national Head Coach and will become WRU employees.

A new Senior Player Selection Policy has also been confirmed which declares that players based outside Wales in future will not be eligible for selection subject to a number of exceptions which the National Head Coach has the right to make. This policy will become active once a minimum of six senior players prioritised by the Wales Head Coach have been signed to National Dual Contracts.

The limit on foreign players in Regional squads has been capped at a maximum of six while each Region will be allowed two so-called time serving players who will be available for Welsh selection after three years residency.

The RSA transfers management of and responsibility for the four Regional Academies for emerging talent in Wales from the WRU to the four Regions with £600,000 of support each year from the WRU in line with a proposal included in the 2009 Participation Agreement.

Within the RSA the WRU retains the right to play up to 13 senior international games each year with a 13-day release facility for squad training before the Six Nations and Autumn series games.

Relevant provisions of the RSA will be monitored and managed through the Professional Regional Game Board which will be chaired by the High Court Judge, Sir Wyn Williams. The chairman of the PRGB holds a casting vote on mutually agreed issues of interest with the exception of certain reserved WRU matters.

The Group Chief Executive of the WRU, Roger Lewis, said: ”This new agreement creates a new and positive relationship within Welsh rugby and is firmly based on the rugby priorities for Wales.

“The National Dual Contracts represent a radical step forward in our mutual aim of retaining Welsh talent here in Wales.

”The new contracts will help us keep more of our best players in Wales and will help stem the flow abroad of the talent we develop here through our academies and Regions.

“I want to thank all four Regions and their representative body, Regional Rugby Wales, for all the hard work involved across recent months. In particular I also want to thank all our supporters, sponsors, staff and especially our players, coaches and rugby staff for their patience.

“The new RSA creates a new rugby environment within which together we can nurture and develop the professional game in Wales.

“It has taken us a long time to reach the conclusion of our negotiations, but that is because of the complicated structure and radical nature of the deal which matches financial distributions with deliverable rugby priorities.

“The Regions are a vitally important component of the structure of Welsh rugby and they have to be able to thrive and develop for the game in Wales to remain successful.

”We now have an agreement which will ensure the pyramid structure which leads from the grassroots right through to the international team is strong and truly fit for purpose.”

The Chairman of the Welsh Rugby Union, David Pickering, said:”This is a landmark agreement which will prove fundamental to the successful development of the professional game in Wales.

“A successful level of Regional rugby is essential if we are going to continue to punch above our weight in the world game.

“The new National Dual Contracts will help us all achieve our agreed aim of keeping as many talented Welsh players here as we can playing Regional rugby.

“It has been a challenging negotiation over many months but that just reflects the importance of the outcome we have all achieved.

“I want to thank all our colleagues from the Regions and their benefactors for working so incredibly hard to help us all achieve the solution which is represented in this new Rugby Services Agreement.”

Chairman of Regional Rugby Wales (RRW) Nigel Short said: “Following long and detailed negotiations, RRW is satisfied that the new agreement with the WRU creates a fair, progressive and credible foundation to protect and support the best interests of Welsh Rugby into the future; with the core objective of delivering a sustainable and competitive professional game in Wales.

“The new agreement is a positive step forward for the long-term benefit of Welsh rugby with plenty of hard work still to be done to ensure that the game in Wales prospers, works in partnership and develops at all levels.

“The Regions would like to express their sincere thanks and gratitude to all their stakeholders and colleagues in the Regions; our players, coaches, staff, supporters groups, sponsors and partners all of whom have remained supportive whilst living with increased degrees of uncertainty.

“With greater clarity and the security of a new agreement, the Regions can forward plan with more focus, working hard to ensure their independent businesses remain competitive. Things will not change overnight – but securing our new agreement in partnership is a positive forward step.

“Clear mutual goals now form the basis of a new agreement that will create a stronger and more productive environment, where our interests are more closely aligned and a thriving domestic game that feeds into the long-term success of the Welsh international rugby.”

RRW and the Regions thanked Sir Wyn Williams for his time, effort and guidance and expressed their recognition of the considerable time and effort undertaken by all those individuals on the Rugby and Commercial of the WRU in reaching an agreement that provides a constructive platform for the future.

Sir Wyn Williams, the High Court Judge who chaired the negotiations and is the Chair of the Professional Regional Game Board said:

“I congratulate WRU, RRW and the four Regions upon reaching an agreement which seeks to provide constructive solutions to the problems which have existed in the professional game in Wales in recent years.

“I am conscious that there has been a good deal of criticism over the length of time which has gone by since the process of making an agreement began. I would like to re-assure Welsh rugby fans that the time has been well spent. In the discussions to which I have been a party all the participants were determined that an agreement should be reached but, inevitably, genuine and legitimate differences of opinion existed which had to be considered and evaluated before consensus could emerge.

“I consider the process which has been undertaken has produced an agreement which will serve the professional game in Wales well over the next six years and has also helped the WRU, RRW and the Regions individually to a much better understanding of each other’s positions on important rugby and commercial matters.”

Additional elements of the new agreement include the return of the Wales A team with a possible fixture each year on the weekend prior to the Six Nations kick off.

The Regional support for the importance of the sevens game is also recognised with the terms of the RSA guaranteeing that up to three players from each Region will be available for Wales sevens selection.

The agreement contains a range of protocols which focus on Welsh qualified players who are based in Wales at any of the four Regions.

In the new deal all the Regional squad players will take part in training camps at the WRU National Centre of Excellence each year as part of the collaborative partnership represented in the RSA.

A national database of relevant player information will be managed by the WRU with specific protocols to ensure individual Regions only have access to their own player information.

14 thoughts on “WRU and RRW Joint Statement: New Rugby Services Agreement

  1. The addition of play in Wales to play for Wales will be interesting given our much smaller player base and the fact that despite central/dual contracts the very best players could still command a hundred grand or more per year abroad. Will we really see us not picking our best players? I hope it doesn’t come to that and we just get the positives – keeping the players in Wales. Got to be good news.

    1. I understand your relief Brighty, but doesn’t this bear all the hall marks of the RFU agreement that you have long held issues with?

      But as I have said before I’ll take the limitations of the EPS any day over the infighting we had before and I suspect you feel likewise.

      I also suspect that the “exceptional circumstances” in picking overseas players might be more relaxed than with England. Let’s face it, whilst Halfpenny is kicking close to 100% from anywhere near the halfway line, he could probably play I’m Japan and still get picked!

      1. Not sure I agree Benjit – my only real issue with the EPS is the set dates for announcing the squads for it and the apparent need then for Lancaster to stick with that squad (I mean both the A & B squads). So there have been issues where players in form in the league are not able to be picked and also players out of form but in the squad have to be persisted with until the set dates when Lancaster can change the squad.

        No such limits exist in the Welsh agreement. Gatland is not limited to picking the central/dual contract players so can still do things like bring the exciting Jordan Williams into the squad on a moments notice based on a few outstanding Scarlets displays.

        But yes, you’re right, the limitations of the EPS are better than fighting and not getting anywhere.

        At the moment guys like Halfpenny are exempt from the rule cos they signed their contracts before the dual contracts came in. The real test will be when it’s up for renewal – that’s all a bit vague. I can see Gatland sticking to it initially, even if it is relaxed later – he’ll want, and need, to make a statement that it’s not toothless even if that means not picking Halfpenny. It’s a scary prospect but England have shown you need to do it – they are going to lose one of the best 7s in the NH to France but if they had not stuck to it then the floodgates would have opened.

        1. And a bit related – can’t help but think that the gods of rugby can’t handle there being no club v union fighting going on somewhere – just as we finally seem to near peace we see war break out in England … and I do remember the French were at loggerheads before us.

        2. But this is a misnomer. SL is free to pick outside the squads and did just that in the last 6n I believe. Most of the time he chooses not to preferring to build a club like culture or wishing to see if the latest real deal is just another flash in the pan. You may disagree with this approach, but it is not the fault of the system.

          1. Benjit, if that’s the case the I was wrong and you are right, my criticism doesn’t hold. I understood the eps/Saxons squad was what he was limited to though eg from reading this – http://www.therugbyblog.com/begrudging-the-england-elite and http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/rugbyunion/article-2665041/Stuart-Lancaster-demands-schedule-changes-England-suffer-New-Zealand-tour.html

            These seem to indicate trouble caused because he can only pick from the EPS? If he can pick anyone then I’m confused.

            1. No I don’t have the link but fairly sure this is an accurate recollection.

              SL wanting to move the timing of the selection is just common sense. He can pick who he wants, but prefers to stick to the EPS, for reasons of stability and keeping the club’s happier. But it makes sense to pick the EPS ahead of AIs and 6n and not the summer tours which are less important (and where clubs will grumble less as the season will have ended).

          2. Benjit, tried to reply with some links but it’s awaiting moderation.

            Do you have a link for that 6ns player? I’ve just been reading blogs/news stories with people moaning that the eps makes some players too safe and also Lancaster making that because he has to pick the eps before the season starts this ties his hand in terms of picking players on form. So it does sound like the limit is there? I’m confused. If you right then I am wrong and my criticism doesn’t hold. Genuine mistake on my part.

            1. Your criticism is just, but the blame is SL and not the EPS. Whilst I prefer more stability from the revolving door selection policies we had under Robinson, it has meant a lot of caps have been wasted on journeymen like Botha, Waldrum, Goode etc…

              1. I’m pretty sure Brighty is right here. The reason for SL moving the EPS squad pick was because he wanted form players available.

                There has to be injuries for SL to pick outside of this squad. That is the whole point of the EPS – so that the clubs can plan better as they have a good idea of who will and will not be around come international season.

                There are obviously pro’s and con’s to this. I do think that overall this way gives SL a good chance of picking the best squad, and still gives the clubs a good amount of control. Quite balanced.

                There are limitations, but not many. As soon as injuries happen (which they always do), there are loopholes. For example, if a centre was to get injured, SL can justifiably pull an in form winger into the squad if he argues that another of his players can cover centre and therefore he needs a winger.

                Does that make sense?

                So whilst there are restrictions in place, if there are extreme examples where SL really wants someone in the squad, this is very doable.

                1. Jacob, do you know where it’s stated he can’t pick outside EPS?

                  My assumption was he can only access the EPS squad for the additional time periods outside of IRB windows, so he gets more prep time with players in the EPS. But he can call up who he wants (injuries or otherwise) within an IRB window.

                  If you have the additional access and prep time with a group he’s unlikely to select outside of that, but I wasn’t aware the agreement blocked him from doing so.

                  Anyway, the major issue with the EPS (picking in July) seems to have been resolved for this year which is the most important point.

                  ….. On this announcement it’s good news all round as far as I can see. Particularly pleased to see an A team reintroduced. The A sides hardly play any fixtures each year now so one additional competitive fixture for all is most welcome.

  2. Who was picked in the 6N from overseas??? Can’t think of anyone. He didn’t even pick Flood, who was in England, because he’d signed overseas.

    It’s not a rule, since there’d be legal issues then, but it’s basically 100% play in England to play for England.

    As to the EPS. Lancaster has to pick and make changes to the EPS at ridiculous times. However, after NZ, the EPS announcement is now delayed until October, precisely to allow him to pick in form players. He’ll still only be allowed so many changes (6 perhaps), but if you need to change more than 6 (excluding the free injury changes) you were picking the wrong squad in the first place.

    A new EPS agreement is due to be set soon. So delayed selection will likely be part of it, and a useful tool on the side of the clubs to get more out of the RFU in other ways. The RFUs biggest bargaining is the refusal to pick overseas players, and it’s always going to be a big stick they can hold over the clubs heads.

Comments are closed.