Rugby Championship 2013 Awards

Player of the Tournament

All Blacks number eight and stand-in captain Kieran Read was simply outstanding in every facet of his game.  His hard-nosed ball-carrying ability was matched by a wonderful pair of hands that provided the assists for several Kiwi tries.  Read crossed the line himself a few times, and showed that New Zealand have a ready-made replacement skipper when Richie McCaw hangs up his boots.  Arguably the best player in world rugby just now.

Try of the Tournament

This year’s Rugby Championship was not lacking in entertaining attacking play, but few of the tournament’s tries matched that scored by Will Genia in Australia’s curtain-raising clash with New Zealand.  Gathering a beautiful inside ball from Michael Hooper, the scrum-half raced in from seventy metres, bamboozling the covering Kiwi defence.  Unfortunately, it was a brief highlight in an otherwise failing performance from the Wallabies.

Best Newcomer

Still learning his trade at test-match level, 22-year-old second row Brodie Retallick stepped in for the injured Luke Romano in week one, and turned in a string of world-class performances from the lock position.  His partnership with Sam Whitelock is probably the best duo around just now, with both getting through a phenomenal amount of work around the field.  Retallick’s tackle counts were consistently among the highest in the games he played, and he combined tireless carrying with good hands and awareness with the ball.

Hero of the Tournament

There is no shortage of contenders for this one, too, among the men who strove bravely for test-match glory.  Jean de Villiers carried the hopes and dreams of a nation with him as he powered over the New Zealand line in their Ellis Park title-decider, and several Wallabies battled courageously through some painful defeats.  However, this award goes to Argentine captain Juan Martin Fernandez Lobbe, whose pride and passion for the Pumas jersey was near-tangible as he continuously ran through brick walls to take his team forward.

Villain of the Tournament

I’m sure those of a South African persuasion will feel a certain Monsieur Poite should be force-fed this particular award – perhaps via a somewhat painful orifice.  However, the undoubted rogue of the Championship was troubled Wallaby back James O’Connor, who was sent packing from the Australian set-up after yet another off-field incident.  His long string of altercations and plights away from the rugby pitch have been well-documented, most recently by Jamie here, and he now finds himself with neither a club nor a country seeking his services next season.

Match of the Tournament

No contest here.  New Zealand’s final round visit to Ellis Park, finishing 38-27 to the Blacks, reminded us what test-match rugby is all about.  Entertaining from start to finish, with nine tries scored in total, and a sumptuous display of running rugby and skill from the two best teams on the planet.  The game was overseen masterfully by Welshman Nigel Owens, whom many regard as the IRB’s top referee, and there is now an obvious and sizeable gap between the Kiwis and South Africa, and the rest of the international sides.

Blunder of the Tournament

Round One saw a worryingly lacklustre Pumas side hammered by sixty points in Soweto.  There were a number of embarrassingly simple tries scored by the Boks that day, but none more so than that bagged by Jean de Villiers.  Following a kick downfield, the skipper latched on to a telegraphed Argentine inside pass to canter in for a humiliating five-pointer.

The Duracell Award for Longevity

Felipe Contepomi made his international debut in 1998, and has showed astonishing durability to continue performing at the highest level for fifteen years.  He was a key component of Argentina’s rise from relative obscurity to the top-tier of world rugby, and would have won well over one-hundred caps had he hailed from any of the home or big three Southern Hemisphere nations.  A close runner-up to Contepomi was All Black veteran Conrad Smith, who remains one of the Kiwis’ most important players, and unparalleled in the sport at outside centre.

The Martin Johnson Award for Excessive Speed

Though Ben Smith grabbed the headlines for his try-scoring exploits, there were few more awesome sights in this year’s Rugby Championship than young Springbok second-row Eben Etzebeth stretching his legs and flying up the touchline in the tournament’s final round.  Leaving several would-be tacklers in his wake, Etzebeth’s pace and power saw him gain over forty metres with the barnstorming run.

The Barney Stinson Award for Prolific Scoring

Ben Smith is undoubtedly the game’s form winger at present, and with his touchdown in that Ellis Park decider, broke the record for most tries in a season of Rugby Championship or Tri Nations matches.  He blitzed the Wallabies with five scores in two games, and powered through Nicolas Sanchez in La Plata to notch a crucial last-minute bonus point try against the Pumas.

The Huggies Award for Teething Problems

The IRB’s latest scrum directive has certainly attracted plenty of opinion, speculation and conjecture since its implementation at the start of August.  Having spoken to plenty of the game’s leading set-piece figures, I can attest to the fact that the scrum remains a veritable minefield of contrasting views.  Having said that, in the Rugby Championship at least, the new protocols looked to bring about an improvement in safety, the importance of technique and a better contest for possession, and a more palatable viewing spectacle for the spectator.   Juan Figallo and Marcos Ayerza were particularly impressive under the directive, despite the Pumas relative shortfall in terms of pack weight at the scrummage.

The Award for Most Catastrophic Commentating

None of the SANZAR nations’ commentary teams are renowned for their impartiality, but the Australian group – despite boasting a plethora of ex-elite players – take the proverbial biscuit.  In between struggling to remember or pronounce the names of Argentine internationals, Phil Kearns (great hooker though he was) interjects with some ill-informed gripe on the scrum protocols (funnily enough, an area the Aussies have struggled in) and some dumbed-down, cringe-worthy banter is shared with viewers.  The lack of insight offered by such an illustrious posse of pundits and observers is startling.

By Jamie Lyall (@JLyall93)

Photo by: Patrick Khachfe / Onside Images

11 thoughts on “Rugby Championship 2013 Awards

  1. Must admit I thoroughly enjoyed that you have called it “The Barney Stinson Award for Prolific Scoring”.

    Some incredible matches played throughout this tournament, but for me a really interesting one was the Argentina vs Australia match in the last round of games. I really thought that was Argentinas chance to get their first win on the board. I was a bit gutted that they didn’t manage to. Obviously they are playing against some great teams, but how long can they be “unlucky”, and not chokers?

  2. The new scrum laws have made a vast improvement I think. Would anyone seriously want to return to the 50/50 days of ‘the hit’…. I didn’t think so.

    1. Exactly. Of course it’s not perfect but to hear the Aussie commentators moaning you would think the changes had just broken something that was working flawlessly.

      I’m enjoying watching the Aussies struggle as they had become masters at the non-scrum under the old rules.

      1. Justin Marshall was a lot worse. He complained every time there was a scrum as if the new scrum laws were a catastrophic disaster to the game. He was already calling for them to be changed.

  3. From what I’ve seen so far, the new scrum regs work very well if they are actually applied by the ref.

    Too many of the refs in the Premiership (and Garces in the Aus v SA match) are still allowing the hit and teams to push before the ball is put in. Some are also still allowing the ball to be fed straight to the second row,

    It was obvious from the NZ v SA game that if the laws are applied correctly then they are manifestly a step forward, with less collapses and some contest for the ball

    I cannot understand why it appears to be so difficult for referees to follow the rules as they are set out!

  4. For me try of the tournament has to go to SAs score just before half time on Saturday. A magic team try.

  5. I know we’re going over old ground here but I still can’t get my head around these new scrum laws.

    Supporters of the new laws are keen to point out that the hit has not been irradicated but simply depowered slightly by making the props bind up first. Thus reducing chances of immediate collapse on impact and also making the whole procedure safer…

    However, given that neither team are allowed to push until the ball comes in (and the 9 has to wait for direction from the ref) then what is the point of the hit at all?

    Traditionally “beating the opposing pack to the hit” enabled you to drive in the ascendancy but if post-hit both sides have to stop pushing and wait then why not just bind up like an uncontested scrum and then shove after the ball comes in…

    What have I missed?


    1. Correct me if I’m mistaken, but the hit was a major reason why the scrum collapsed so much before. The hit should be eliminated because the team that hit first was likely to win, which in turn, increased the likelihood that teams would collapse it if they lost the hit or cheat to get that hit first. The hit was everything.

      The benefit of the new scrum law is that now it now the scrum can be used as an weapon again (instead of the likely chance of a reset) because it allows the packs to push after the ball is fed straight, which puts pressure on either the defense or attacking team. The better scrummaging teams will be rewarded because technique and skill matter. Thus, the scrum is relevant again.

      I’m a big fan of the new scrums.

      1. Yes, I’m not against the new scrum laws per se, but my point is that given neither team are allowed to push until the ball comes in then why not get rid of the hit entirely and have a “soft” engage resulting in even fewer collapsed scrums….

        We seem to be in some sort of compromise situation under the current engagement sequence with teams still trying to hit but then supposedly not being able to do much once engaged until the ball comes in?

        1. I thought the IRB got rid of the hit and it’s now a “soft” engage. The sequence is now “crouch, bind, set.” The hit has been eliminated. I think what you are seeing is teams trying to get comfortable with the new engagement and are still hitting on “set.” It will be sorted out eventually.

  6. I think that the crouch, bind, set, will eventually come good. The problem I have, is with the referees telling the scrum half when to put the ball into the scrum. This gives the other team the signal to put the eight man shove on whilst the hooker is striking for the ball. The scrum half putting ball into scrum should decide when the ball is put into scrum, which is the way it used to be. The argument against that would be that the referee is waiting, for safety reasons to ensure that scrum is steady. However for me, the refs are waiting to long and that is also causing the scrums to collapse. The players themselves have got to their act together as there is still to much ” nod and wink” tactics on engagement.

Comments are closed.